the full Flyben vs Lycoming mainstream aircraft piston engine comparison table and analysis​
the full Flyben vs Lycoming mainstream aircraft piston engine comparison table and analysis​
the full Flyben vs Lycoming mainstream aircraft piston engine comparison table and analysis​
the full Flyben vs Lycoming mainstream aircraft piston engine comparison table and analysis​
Previous
Next

the full Flyben vs Lycoming mainstream aircraft piston engine comparison table and analysis​

  • The Flyben engine brings a fresh approach to general aviation propulsion. At its core is an air-cooled, four-cylinder, horizontally opposed design with a displacement of 3520 cc. It delivers up to 170 hp at 3300 rpm while weighing just 81.2 kg dry—significantly lighter than most Lycoming engine models of similar output. This lightweight advantage helps preserve aircraft agility and payload capacity, especially in experimental builds where every kilogram matters. Advanced engineering defines the Flyben engine. It features dual electronic spark ignition and dual ECU systems, ensuring that if one circuit fails, the backup maintains safe operation. The optional turbocharging system boosts performance at altitude, giving pilots stronger climb rates and better versatility in diverse climates. In contrast, many Lycoming engine variants rely on dual magneto ignition and carburetion in base models, although later versions like the IO-360 add fuel injection for improved high-altitude response.

Description



      Here’s the full Flyben vs Lycoming mainstream aircraft piston engine comparison table and analysis  keeping the structure and details intact for easy reference  


Flyben vs Lycoming Mainstream Models – Specification & Value Comparison Table

Item
Flyben FB160T (China)
Lycoming O-320 (USA)
Lycoming O-360 (USA)
Lycoming IO-360 (USA)
Manufacturer
Jiangsu Flyben Engine Co., Ltd
Lycoming Engines (Textron)
Lycoming Engines
Lycoming Engines
Cylinder Layout
4-cylinder, horizontally opposed
4-cylinder, horizontally opposed
4-cylinder, horizontally opposed
4-cylinder, horizontally opposed
Cooling
Full air cooling
Full air cooling
Full air cooling
Full air cooling
Aspiration
Turbocharged
Naturally aspirated
Naturally aspirated
Naturally aspirated
Ignition
Dual electronic spark ignition
Dual magneto ignition
Dual magneto ignition
Dual electronic ignition
Fuel System
Electronic fuel injection + dual electronic fuel pumps
Carburetor
Carburetor
Fuel injection
Displacement
3520 cc
521 cu in (≈ 8540 cc)
361 cu in (≈ 5915 cc)
361 cu in (≈ 5915 cc)
Bore × Stroke
105.7 mm × 100.2 mm
130.2 mm × 111.1 mm
130.2 mm × 111.1 mm
130.2 mm × 111.1 mm
Compression Ratio
8.1:1
8.5:1
8.5:1
8.5:1
Max Power
170 hp @ 3300 rpm
160 hp @ 2700 rpm
180 hp @ 2700 rpm
180–200 hp @ 2800 rpm
Max Torque
370 Nm @ 3300 rpm
~218 Nm @ 2700 rpm
~245 Nm @ 2700 rpm
~260 Nm @ 2800 rpm
Dry Weight
81.2 kg
≈ 122 kg
≈ 127 kg
≈ 132 kg
Operating Weight
94.5 kg
≈ 135 kg
≈ 140 kg
≈ 145 kg
Fuel Type
98# gasoline / 100LL AvGas
100LL AvGas
100LL AvGas
100LL AvGas
Alternator
Integrated 30A (13.7V)
Optional
Optional
Optional
Starting
Electric start
Electric start
Electric start
Electric start
Time Between Overhauls (TBO)
2000 h (naturally aspirated)
1500 h (turbocharged)
2000 h
2000 h
1800–2000 h
New Unit Price (Reference)
≈ 15,000–18,000 (about 1/3 of similar imports)
45,000–55,000
50,000–65,000
60,000–75,000
Certification
Currently for flight testing only;
FAA/EASA certification in progress
FAA/EASA fully certified, global use
FAA/EASA fully certified
FAA/EASA fully certified
Typical Applications
Experimental aircraft, flight testing,
prototypes, light sport aircraft (pending certification)
Trainer aircraft, small GA aircraft,
light sport aircraft
Light sport aircraft,
general aviation
General aviation,
high-altitude/high-temperature needs
Advantages
Low price, lightweight, compact,
dual ECU/dual ignition for safety
Proven reliability, extensive global support network
Higher power, mature platform
Fuel injection improves high-altitude performance
Disadvantages
No commercial certification yet;
limited applications
Higher price, heavier
Higher price, heavier
Higher price, more complex maintenance

Value Analysis

  1. Price Advantage

The Flyben FB160T new unit price is only about 1/3 of similar-class Lycoming O-320/O-360 models, making it highly attractive for budget-limited experimental, training, and prototyping projects.


Weight-to-Power Ratio
Flyben dry weight is just 81.2 kg, roughly 40–45 kg lighter than comparable Lycoming engines, helping preserve payload and maneuverability in light aircraft.


Technology Features
Flyben comes with dual electronic ignition, dual ECU, electronic fuel injection, and optional turbocharging — technologically competitive with imported models, even ahead in digital control features.


Certification & Usage Scope
Lycoming models are fully FAA/EASA certified for commercial operations worldwide; Flyben is currently approved only for flight testing and experimental use, pending certification for commercial use.


Maintenance & Support
Lycoming has a well-established global parts and service network; Flyben’s support is mainly in Asia at present, but expected to expand with increased production.

    Selection Recommendations

    Sufficient Budget & Need for Commercial Operation → Choose Lycoming (O-320 / O-360 / IO-360); mature, reliable, globally certified.


    Limited Budget & Used for Experimentation/Testing/Light Sport Prototypes → Choose Flyben FB160T; excellent value, lightweight, advanced tech, but must confirm local regulations allow flight-test use.


    High-Altitude or Hot Climate Operations → Lycoming IO-360 or Flyben turbo version offers more stable performance, though Flyben turbo has shorter TBO (1500 h).

Flyben vs Lycoming

     Flyben Engine: The Game-Changing Choice for Affordable High-Performance Aircraft Power—See How This Chinese Innovation Outshines the Lycoming Engine in Weight, Price & Tech While Awaiting FAA Certification for Broader Use  

     When it comes to aircraft piston engines, buyers often compare the established Lycoming engine brand with emerging manufacturers. One name rising fast in experimental and light sport aviation is Flyben engine, produced by Jiangsu Flyben Engine Co., Ltd. This article explores how the Flyben engine matches up against the legendary Lycoming engine, examining specifications, technology, pricing, and real-world suitability to help you choose the right powerplant for your project.

    The Flyben engine brings a fresh approach to general aviation propulsion. At its core is an air-cooled, four-cylinder, horizontally opposed design with a displacement of 3520 cc. It delivers up to 170 hp at 3300 rpm while weighing just 81.2 kg dry—significantly lighter than most Lycoming engine models of similar output. This lightweight advantage helps preserve aircraft agility and payload capacity, especially in experimental builds where every kilogram matters.
Advanced engineering defines the Flyben engine. It features dual electronic spark ignition and dual ECU systems, ensuring that if one circuit fails, the backup maintains safe operation. The optional turbocharging system boosts performance at altitude, giving pilots stronger climb rates and better versatility in diverse climates. In contrast, many Lycoming engine variants rely on dual magneto ignition and carburetion in base models, although later versions like the IO-360 add fuel injection for improved high-altitude response.
     Cost is where the Flyben engine truly stands out. According to Flyben Aviation Engines: Core Advantages & Current Limitations, its price is only one-third of comparable foreign products. For budget-conscious builders, flight schools, and R&D teams, this makes the Flyben engine an exceptional value proposition. By comparison, popular Lycoming engine models such as the O-320 and O-360 typically range from 45,000to65,000 new, whereas the Flyben engine comes in at roughly 15,000–18,000, offering similar or better power-to-weight ratios at a fraction of the cost.
However, there is a vital distinction in certification status. As noted in the same source, Flyben’s aviation engines lack full FAA or EASA certification at present. They are approved for flight testing purposes only, which restricts commercial or fully regulated aviation operations. This means the Flyben engine is currently a top pick for experimental aircraft, prototypes, and training flights rather than airline or charter use. Meanwhile, the Lycoming engine lineup enjoys comprehensive FAA/EASA certification, supported by a global service network and decades of field reliability. This makes Lycoming engines the go-to for pilots and operators needing certified powerplants for revenue-generating flights.
Maintenance planning is another consideration. Flyben provides clear, tiered overhaul intervals: 2000 flight hours for naturally aspirated variants and 1500 hours for turbocharged versions. These figures align with industry norms for experimental power units and give operators predictable budgeting for upkeep. Lycoming engines typically offer similar TBO figures (1800–2000 hours), but benefit from a mature supply chain for parts and experienced service centers worldwide.


     From a technical standpoint, both engine families have merits. The Lycoming engine O-360 delivers 180 hp from a larger 5915 cc displacement and weighs around 127 kg dry. Its proven architecture and widespread adoption make it a safe, well-understood choice. The Flyben engine, however, achieves comparable horsepower with a much smaller package and lower mass, thanks to modern materials and efficient turbocharging. Its integrated 30A alternator and electric start further simplify installation compared with some legacy Lycoming engine setups that may require additional accessories.
Fuel compatibility also differs slightly. The Flyben engine runs on 98# automotive gasoline as well as 100LL AvGas, potentially reducing operating costs in regions where auto gas is permitted for aircraft. Most Lycoming engines are designed exclusively for 100LL AvGas, which can be more expensive and less available in some markets.
When evaluating overall value, the Flyben engine excels in scenarios where cost, weight, and compactness are priorities and where certification is not an immediate requirement. For experimental aircraft builders, flight test programs, and emerging-market training fleets, the Flyben engine opens doors that were previously closed due to price barriers. On the other hand, the Lycoming engine remains unmatched for commercial operations, international travel, and applications demanding certified reliability backed by global support.
      Choosing between them depends on your mission profile. If you need a proven, certified engine for passenger transport or long-term commercial use, the Lycoming engine is the safe, established choice. But if you are developing a new aircraft, conducting flight research, or launching a low-cost training program, the Flyben engine offers cutting-edge features and dramatic savings, allowing you to invest more in airframe quality or expand fleet size.
Both the Flyben engine and the Lycoming engine reflect different stages of aviation evolution. Lycoming continues to refine a trusted formula honed over decades, while Flyben pushes affordable innovation with modern electronics and lightweight design. As Flyben progresses toward FAA certification, its competitive edge may soon extend into broader markets, challenging the dominance of traditional Western manufacturers.
     For now, experimental aircraft enthusiasts and cost-focused operators will find the Flyben engine a compelling alternative to the Lycoming engine, delivering high performance, advanced safety through dual ECU/ignition systems, and outstanding affordability. When certification arrives, Flyben could reshape the entry-level aviation power landscape.
If you’re looking for a reliable, lightweight, and budget-friendly aircraft engine for testing or prototype projects, consider the Flyben engine from Jiangsu Flyben Engine Co., Ltd. Compare its specs with the Lycoming engine to see how much performance and savings you can unlock. Contact Flyben today for detailed datasheets, overhaul guidelines, and updates on certification progress, and take the first step toward integrating this promising engine into your aviation ambitions.


GET A QUOTE

Changzhou Zhonglian Aviation Technology Co., Ltd

Quick Inquiry